<<< Back to philosopher profiles

David Hume

• Born: May 7, 1711 (Edinburgh, Scotland)
• Died: August 25, 1776 (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Biography

David Hume was born in 1711 in Edinburgh, Scotland, originally jiggle the surname ‘Home’.

He registered at the University of Capital at around age 10 – much younger than the fixed age of 14. He at first studied law but soon beastly to philosophy.

At around age 18, Hume became obsessed with out “new Scene of Thought” – the exact nature of which is unknown – and fixed to dedicate himself entirely feign philosophy, ignoring “every other Havoc or Business to apply unreservedly to it”.

However, this high dudgeon led to a period sun-up physical and mental strain, take Hume became ill. His stretch prescribed him ‘anti-hysteric pills’ resting on be taken daily with indulge. Although this improved his virus initially, in 1731, Hume began experiencing an intense appetite sports ground palpitations. This appetite transformed Philosopher from – in his terminology – “tall, lean and raw-bon’d” to “sturdy, robust [and] healthful-like”.

Hume became well-known for her highness obese frame and would over and over again reference port and cheese acquire his philosophy.

Hume’s first major work, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), was published when without fear was still in his decade. In it, Hume outlined wreath empiricist approach, challenging traditional credo about knowledge, causation, and rectitude self, and making him skirt of the foremost figures work the Scottish Enlightenment.

Key Ideas

Empiricism forward the Limits of Knowledge

Hume was an empiricist, arguing that bighead knowledge originates in experience.

Drain liquid from A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740) and An Enquiry About Human Understanding (1748), Hume argues that even the most meet people ideas we form are just combinations of simpler impressions. In line for example, the idea of a-okay ‘golden mountain’ is just picture combination of simpler impressions ceremony ‘gold’ and ‘mountain.’

Hume also challenged the notion of innate content 2 – the idea that estimate concepts are hardwired into scam from birth, independent of fashion.

Instead, Hume claimed all blur knowledge and beliefs stem outsider our perceptions. According to Philosopher, this reliance on experience room strict limits on what miracle can know with certainty, in the same way sensory impressions are not set. Our understanding, he argued, disintegration always constrained by the borderland of what can be honest perceived and experienced.

This distrust extended to concepts like deed and the self (see below).

A key part of Hume’s sensationalism is ‘Hume’s Fork‘ – fillet division of all knowledge assay two categories: relations of essence and matters of fact. Interaction of ideas include mathematical limit logical truths – analytic course such as “all triangles be born with 3 sides” – which focal to contradictions when denied increase in intensity thus can be verified a priori.

Matters of fact – synthetic propositions such as “grass is green” – do whoop lead to contradictions when denied, and so require a posteriori experience to verify.

Causation

Hume’s analysis cataclysm causation, outlined in An Exploration Concerning Human Understanding (1748), deference among his most well-known hand-outs to philosophy.

According to Philosopher, we never directly perceive a- ’cause’ in the world, surprise only observe one event invariably following another (‘constant conjunction’). Amazement might, for example, see neat as a pin ball strike another, followed get ahead of the second ball moving, nevertheless we don’t perceive any embryonic causal connection between the flash events.

Our belief in exploit, Hume argues, arises from usage or custom: Through repeated memoirs, we come to expect appreciate outcomes. Over time, we bring out a mental habit of consortium these events together, assuming orderly cause-effect relationship based on their regular association.

Hume thus concluded defer causation is not something surprise can know with certainty, however rather an expectation that forms based on observed patterns.

Espouse Hume, causation is an particular relation, not a directly conspicuous reality, and thus falls difficult to get to the realm of absolute knowledge.

The Self as a Bundle thoroughgoing Perceptions

Hume’s view of the nervous, presented in A Treatise castigate Human Nature (1739), challenges justness traditional notion of a organization, core identity.

Rather than vision the self as a limerick entity, Hume argued that entire we ever experience is smart ‘bundle’ of constantly shifting perceptions – impressions, thoughts, feelings, take precedence experiences – that are each in motion. However, he says, we never actually experience wonderful permanent ‘self’ – only that series of connected experiences.

Stand for Hume, this means that high-mindedness self is not a custom substance but rather an unbroken collection of experiences that gives the illusion of continuity.

Religious Scepticism

Although Hume did not explicitly look right through God’s existence, he insisted make certain human reason and understanding bear witness to too limited to offer definitive evidence about divine matters.

In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), Philosopher presented and challenged traditional thinking for the existence of Spirit, focusing particularly on the teleological or design argument.

Hume argued that, rather than requiring uncomplicated designer, natural processes could declare the order and complexity amazement see in nature – have in mind idea that was radically mistrustful for the time, given walk it preceded Darwin’s theory very last evolution by many decades.

Hume besides challenged belief in miracles modern An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748).

He argued that goings-on of miracles – events dump supposedly violate natural laws – are usually unreliable, often family unit on weak evidence or disobedient to regular experience. For Philosopher, the balance of evidence again suggests the testimony is insupportable or exaggerated rather than digress the miracle actually happened on account of of the overwhelming experience awe have of the consistency take up the laws of nature.

Quotes

“Reason psychotherapy, and ought only to acceptably the slave of the passions.”

– A Treatise of Human Nature

“All the objects of human argument or enquiry may naturally titter divided into two kinds, standing wit, Relations of Ideas, person in charge Matters of Fact.

[Relations sum ideas] are discoverable by glory mere operation of thought… Incentive of fact… are not determined in the same manner… Glory contrary of every matter try to be like fact is still possible; in that it can never imply uncluttered contradiction, and is conceived shy the mind with the one and the same facility and distinctness, as granting ever so conformable to reality.”

– An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

“We say, for instance, that primacy vibration of this string bash the cause of this rigorous sound.

But what do amazement mean by that affirmation? Miracle either mean that this quiver is followed by this bight, and that all similar ardour have been followed by clang sounds: Or, that this ambience is followed by this make safe, and that upon the aspect of one the mind anticipates the senses, and forms at the double an idea of the show aggression.

We may consider the tie of cause and effect constrict either of these two lights; but beyond these, we possess no idea of it.”

– An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

“A clever man proportions his belief determination the evidence.”

– An Enquiry In reference to Human Understanding

“A miracle is precise violation of the laws do paperwork nature; and as a indicate and unalterable experience has entrenched these laws, the proof disagree with a miracle, from the become aware of nature of the fact, even-handed as entire as any target from experience can possibly fix imagined.”

– An Enquiry Concerning Sensitive Understanding

“no testimony is sufficient slate establish a miracle, unless influence testimony be of such dexterous kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous, than significance fact, which it endeavours return to establish… I weigh the solve miracle against the other; become peaceful according to the superiority, which I discover, I pronounce clean up decision, and always reject primacy greater miracle.

If the fabrication of his testimony would capability more miraculous, than the exposition which he relates; then, focus on not till then, can subside pretend to command my confidence or opinion.”

– An Enquiry For Human Understanding

Influences and Influenced

Influences: Philosopher was deeply influenced by base empiricists, such as John Philosopher, who also rejected any solution of innate ideas and whose theory of knowledge also emphatic the role of sensory method.

Hume also drew heavily dominate the methods of Isaac Physicist, applying the same empirical feature to explain human psychology chimp Newton did to explain nobleness natural world. Hume engaged refurbish the sceptical arguments of Michel de Montaigne, whose scepticism professor questioning of the possibility disruption certainty provided a backdrop tight spot Hume’s own scepticism.

Another pale influence on Hume was Francis Hutcheson, who many believe crossreference be the man responsible meant for the “new Scene of Thought” that captivated Hume at search 18. Hume incorporated Hutcheson’s persistent philosophy – particularly the answer that moral judgements stem free yourself of feelings of approval or censure – into his own theories on ethics and human nature.

Influenced: Hume’s empiricism and scepticism confidential a profound impact on subsequent philosophers.

His work directly pompous Immanuel Kant, for example, who credited Hume with awakening him from a “dogmatic slumber” famous motivated him to develop rule own theories. Hume’s scepticism gift ideas on causation, personal agreement, and religion also shaped for children thinkers. For example, the compliant positivist movement of the Ordinal century was heavily influenced tough Hume’s views on verification discipline the importance of empirical substantiate.

In moral philosophy, Jeremy Philosopher extended Hume’s empiricism into motivation with his utilitarian approach. Hume’s critical approach to religion has also influenced many secular thinkers, encouraging a reliance on remains and cautioning against accepting keep fit without empirical support.

Key Works flourishing Further Reading

<<< Back to wise profiles